4.8 Article

Rare SLC13A1 variants associate with intervertebral disc disorder highlighting role of sulfate in disc pathology

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28167-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [H2020-2020-848099]
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF17OC0027594, NNF14CC0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Back pain is a common and debilitating disorder with largely unknown underlying biology. In this study, a genome-wide association study was conducted using diagnoses assigned in clinical practice, and 41 variants at 33 loci were identified. The most significant association was found with a variant in the CHST3 gene, which is expressed in intervertebral discs. Rare loss-of-function variants in the SLC13A1 gene were also associated with back pain.
Back pain is a common and debilitating disorder with largely unknown underlying biology. Here we report a genome-wide association study of back pain using diagnoses assigned in clinical practice; dorsalgia (119,100 cases, 909,847 controls) and intervertebral disc disorder (IDD) (58,854 cases, 922,958 controls). We identify 41 variants at 33 loci. The most significant association (ORIDD = 0.92, P = 1.6 x 10(-39); ORdorsalgia = 0.92, P = 7.2 x 10(-15)) is with a 3'UTR variant (rs1871452-T) in CHST3, encoding a sulfotransferase enzyme expressed in intervertebral discs. The largest effects on IDD are conferred by rare (MAF = 0.07 - 0.32%) loss-of-function (LoF) variants in SLC13A1, encoding a sodium-sulfate co-transporter (LoF burden OR = 1.44, P = 3.1 x 10(-11)); variants that also associate with reduced serum sulfate. Genes implicated by this study are involved in cartilage and bone biology, as well as neurological and inflammatory processes. Little is known about the biology of back pain, a leading cause of disability. Here the authors report 30 new back pain loci, implicating genes involved in cartilage/bone biology, as well as neurological and inflammatory processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据