4.8 Article

A metabolome atlas of the aging mouse brain

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26310-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [U2C ES030158, U19 AG023122, U2C-DK119886]
  2. KOMP2-Phase 2 Production and Phenotyping by the DTCC Consortium (NIH) [UM1 OD023221]
  3. Postdoctoral International Exchange Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying the metabolome atlas of aging wildtype mouse brains, it was found that metabolites significantly differ between different brain regions or age groups, with no effect of sex on these differences. Metabolic pathways undergo changes during aging, and functionally related brain regions also show similarities in metabolism. As age increases, metabolic correlations decrease, and cross-region correlation patterns reflect decreased brain segregation.
The mammalian brain relies on neurochemistry to fulfill its functions. Yet, the complexity of the brain metabolome and its changes during diseases or aging remain poorly understood. Here, we generate a metabolome atlas of the aging wildtype mouse brain from 10 anatomical regions spanning from adolescence to old age. We combine data from three assays and structurally annotate 1,547 metabolites. Almost all metabolites significantly differ between brain regions or age groups, but not by sex. A shift in sphingolipid patterns during aging related to myelin remodeling is accompanied by large changes in other metabolic pathways. Functionally related brain regions (brain stem, cerebrum and cerebellum) are also metabolically similar. In cerebrum, metabolic correlations markedly weaken between adolescence and adulthood, whereas at old age, cross-region correlation patterns reflect decreased brain segregation. We show that metabolic changes can be mapped to existing gene and protein brain atlases. The brain metabolome atlas is publicly available (https://mouse.atlas.metabolomics.us/) and serves as a foundation dataset for future metabolomic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据