4.8 Article

Bone morphogenetic protein 1.3 inhibition decreases scar formation and supports cardiomyocyte survival after myocardial infarction

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27622-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. project INCardio - European Regional Development Fund
  2. Interreg V-A Italy-Austria 2014-2020
  3. Scientific Center of Excellence for Reproductive and Regenerative Medicine (project Reproductive and regenerative medicine-exploration of new platforms and potentials - EU through the ERDF) [GA KK01.1.1.01.0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the inhibition of the specific isoform of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1 (BMP1.3) by a monoclonal antibody can reduce cardiac fibrosis and provide cardioprotection through inhibiting the Transforming Growth Factor beta pathway and inducing BMP5. It suggests the therapeutic potential of anti-BMP1.3 antibodies in preventing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reducing collagen deposition, and preserving cardiac function after ischemia.
Despite the high prevalence of ischemic heart diseases worldwide, no antibody-based treatment currently exists. Starting from the evidence that a specific isoform of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1 (BMP1.3) is particularly elevated in both patients and animal models of myocardial infarction, here we assess whether its inhibition by a specific monoclonal antibody reduces cardiac fibrosis. We find that this treatment reduces collagen deposition and cross-linking, paralleled by enhanced cardiomyocyte survival, both in vivo and in primary cultures of cardiac cells. Mechanistically, we show that the anti-BMP1.3 monoclonal antibody inhibits Transforming Growth Factor beta pathway, thus reducing myofibroblast activation and inducing cardioprotection through BMP5. Collectively, these data support the therapeutic use of anti-BMP1.3 antibodies to prevent cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduce collagen deposition and preserve cardiac function after ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据