4.8 Article

Cortical state dynamics and selective attention define the spatial pattern of correlated variability in neocortex

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27724-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swartz Foundation
  2. NIH [EY014924, R01 EB026949]
  3. Pershing Square Foundation
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Correlated activity fluctuations in the neocortex influence sensory responses and behavior. We measured correlations within columns in the visual cortex and found that these correlations can be explained by columnar On-Off dynamics. Our study reveals how the interactions between cortical state dynamics, anatomical connectivity, and attention give rise to spatially structured patterns of correlated variability.
Correlated activity fluctuations in the neocortex influence sensory responses and behavior. Neural correlations reflect anatomical connectivity but also change dynamically with cognitive states such as attention. Yet, the network mechanisms defining the population structure of correlations remain unknown. We measured correlations within columns in the visual cortex. We show that the magnitude of correlations, their attentional modulation, and dependence on lateral distance are explained by columnar On-Off dynamics, which are synchronous activity fluctuations reflecting cortical state. We developed a network model in which the On-Off dynamics propagate across nearby columns generating spatial correlations with the extent controlled by attentional inputs. This mechanism, unlike previous proposals, predicts spatially non-uniform changes in correlations during attention. We confirm this prediction in our columnar recordings by showing that in superficial layers the largest changes in correlations occur at intermediate lateral distances. Our results reveal how spatially structured patterns of correlated variability emerge through interactions of cortical state dynamics, anatomical connectivity, and attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据