4.8 Article

Deep phenotyping of Alzheimer's disease leveraging electronic medical records identifies sex-specific clinical associations

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28273-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA [R01AG060393, R01AG057683, RF1AG068325]
  2. Medical Scientist Training Program [T32GM007618]
  3. [1 RF1 AG059319-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's Disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that is affected by sex, but the reasons for this remain largely unknown. In this study, the authors used electronic medical records to analyze clinical characteristics and sex-specific clinical associations in Alzheimer's Disease.
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is still not fully understood. Sex modifies AD vulnerability, but the reasons for this are largely unknown. We utilize two independent electronic medical record (EMR) systems across 44,288 patients to perform deep clinical phenotyping and network analysis to gain insight into clinical characteristics and sex-specific clinical associations in AD. Embeddings and network representation of patient diagnoses demonstrate greater comorbidity interactions in AD in comparison to matched controls. Enrichment analysis identifies multiple known and new diagnostic, medication, and lab result associations across the whole cohort and in a sex-stratified analysis. With this data-driven method of phenotyping, we can represent AD complexity and generate hypotheses of clinical factors that can be followed-up for further diagnostic and predictive analyses, mechanistic understanding, or drug repurposing and therapeutic approaches. Sex modifies Alzheimer's Disease vulnerability, but the reasons for this are largely unknown. Here, the authors utilize two independent electronic medical record systems to perform deep clinical phenotyping and network analysis to gain insight into clinical characteristics and sex-specific clinical associations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据