4.8 Article

A national cohort study (2000-2018) of long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia in older adults in the United States

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27049-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [NIA/NIH R01 AG074357]
  2. HERCULES Center [P30 ES019776]
  3. Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) of Emory University [P50 AG025688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that long-term exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 is associated with the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in older adults.
Air pollution may increase risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in the U.S., but the extent of this relationship is unclear. Here, we constructed two national U.S. population-based cohorts of those aged >= 65 from the Medicare Chronic Conditions Warehouse (2000-2018), combined with high-resolution air pollution datasets, to investigate the association of long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O-3) with dementia and AD incidence, respectively. We identified similar to 2.0 million incident dementia cases (N = 12,233,371; dementia cohort) and similar to 0.8 million incident AD cases (N = 12,456,447; AD cohort). Per interquartile range (IQR) increase in the 5-year average PM2.5 (3.2 mu g/m(3)), NO2 (11.6 ppb), and warm-season O-3 (5.3 ppb) over the past 5 years prior to diagnosis, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.060 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054, 1.066), 1.019 (95% CI: 1.012, 1.026), and 0.990 (95% CI: 0.987, 0.993) for incident dementias, and 1.078 (95% CI: 1.070, 1.086), 1.031 (95% CI: 1.023, 1.039), and 0.982 (95%CI: 0.977, 0.986) for incident AD, respectively, for the three pollutants. For both outcomes, concentration-response relationships for PM2.5 and NO2 were approximately linear. Our study suggests that exposures to PM2.5 and NO2 are associated with incidence of dementia and AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据