4.5 Article

Hospital volume and outcomes of pancreatic cancer: a Finnish population-based nationwide study

期刊

HPB
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 841-847

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  2. Vieno and Alli Suorsa Healthcare Foundation
  3. Georg C. and Mary Ehrnrooth Foundation
  4. Finnish State Research Fund
  5. Instrumentarium Science Foundation
  6. Finnish Cancer Foundation
  7. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  8. Pivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher annual hospital volume of pancreatic surgery is associated with improved short- and long-term survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Background: Pancreatic cancer surgery is associated with high incidence of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess whether the hospital volume of pancreatic surgery is associated with better survival in a population-based setting.Methods: All patients who underwent pancreatic resection for cancer in Finland during 1997-2016 were identified from nationwide registries. The follow-up ended on 31 December 2019. Patients were divided into quintiles based on annual hospital volume (4-year moving average): <4, 5-9, 10-18, 19-36 and > 37 resections per year. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity and year of surgery.Results: The number of diagnosed pancreatic cancers was 22,724. Of these, 1514 underwent pancreatic surgery due to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The 5-year survival ranged from 12% to 28%, increasing with higher annual operative volume. Adjusted 5-year mortality was higher in all other quintiles compared to the highest annual volume quintile (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.75). Thirty and 90-day mortality were higher in the three lowest volume, compared to the highest quintile.Conclusion: Higher annual hospital volume of pancreatic surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with improved short- and long-term survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据