4.5 Article

Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Substitution on Greenhouse Gas Emission in a Paddy Field of South China Under Ridge Irrigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 837-847

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00695-7

关键词

Ridge irrigation; Global warming potential; Greenhouse gas emission intensity; Methane emission; Nitrous oxide emission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42167035]
  2. Scientific Research and Technology Development Program of Guangxi (CN) [AD17195060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of Chinese milk vetch as a substitution for part of the urea is a suitable method for ridge irrigation, which can increase rice yield and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
Ridge irrigation (RI) is a water-saving irrigation mode for paddy fields, and the effects of part of urea substituted by organic manure and controlled-release urea on greenhouse gas emission under RI mode are not clear and need to be investigated. A field experiment with four nitrogen treatments (F0: only urea; F1: Chinese milk vetch replacing 30% urea; F2: pig manure replacing 30% urea; and F3: controlled-release urea replacing 30% urea) and two irrigation modes (conventional irrigation CI and RI) in south China was conducted to determine rice yield, methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, global warming potential (GWP), and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Compared to F0, three urea substitution treatments increased the yield by 14.6-23.2% and reduced N2O emission by 26.4-57.9%; F1 decreased CH4 emission by 22.3-30.8%; and F2 increased CH4 emission by 59.9-120.9%. Compared to F0, F1 decreased GWP and GHGI by 23.1-31.3 and 39.0-41.2% while F2 increased them by 53.9-111.6 and 55.7-57.2%, respectively. Compared with CI mode, RI mode decreased GWP and GHGI by 7.8-34.0 and 16.7-28.4%, respectively. Chinese milk vetch replacing 30% urea was a suitable urea substitution method under ridge irrigation, which can increase rice yield and decrease GWP and GHGI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据