4.7 Article

Differential fermentation of raw and processed high-amylose and waxy maize starches in the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®)

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104735

关键词

High-amylose starch; Waxy starch; Cooking and cooling; Colonic fermentation; Short-chain fatty acids; SHIME

资金

  1. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the colonic fermentation profiles of high-amylose and waxy maize starches in different forms using the SHIME system, and found that cooked high-amylose starch resulted in the highest butyrate production in both proximal and distal colon vessels. It also showed that all starch preparations increased Bifidobacteriaceae abundance in the proximal colon vessel and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, with differences in fermentation outcomes in different colon regions depending on the starch amylose content.
This study aimed to evaluate the colonic fermentation profiles of both high-amylose and waxy maize starches in raw, cooked, and cooked-cooled forms, as measured by changes in short-chain fatty acid production and microbiota composition, using the Mucosal-Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME). Adding starch (6 g/L) to basal feed promoted butyrate production in SHIME proximal and distal colon vessels. The cooked high-amylose starch induced the highest butyrate production in both colon vessels, while the cooked waxy starch induced the highest butyrate production in the distal but not the proximal colon vessel. All starch preparations increased Bifidobacteriaceae abundance in the proximal colon vessel (2- to 6-fold) and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. The cooked high-amylose starch increased Akkermansiaceae abundance in the distal (2fold) but not the proximal colon vessel. The results indicate the cooking and cooling effect on starch fermentation outcome in successive colon regions depends on the starch amylose content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据