4.4 Article

Transposing flood risk from extreme rainfall events: A case study of Hurricane Harvey

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12778

关键词

flood frequency; flood risk; hurricanes; peak flows; regional regression; return periods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hurricane Harvey caused unprecedented flooding near Houston, Texas, leading to alterations in flood frequency statistics. Traditional flood frequency methodologies may not fully account for the impact of Harvey making landfall elsewhere, and the increased intensity of Harvey due to climate change may make it a better indicator of future hurricanes than historical observations.
Hurricane Harvey produced unprecedented flooding that altered flood frequency statistics near Houston, Texas. While Harvey could have made landfall elsewhere along the Gulf coast, traditional flood frequency methodologies only consider the risk of Harvey in the region that it hit. This may be a shortcoming of flood frequency methodologies as the intensity of Harvey was greater due to climate change; therefore, Harvey may be more indicative of future hurricanes than other historical observations. To that end, this study investigates what effect Harvey would have had on flood frequency statistics if it had made landfall elsewhere. To do so, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to shift Harvey's rainfall within alternative landfall locations. This rainfall was then applied to synthetic unit hydrographs to estimate peak flows that were applied in Log Pearson III and Regional Flood Frequency Analyses. Log Pearson III analyses with simulated Harvey streamflows produced median 100-year peak flows that were 17%-66% higher than analyses that only used historical records. A regional flood frequency analysis in the central coastal geomorphologic region of Texas showed that predictive equations, based upon basin area and shape factor, had an average increase of 30.2% in the 100-year peak discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据