4.8 Article

Controlled synthesis of Bi- and tri-nuclear Cu-oxo nanoclusters on metal-organic frameworks and the structure-reactivity correlations

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 50-58

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc05495c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [15300819, 25300918]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21902139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research focusing on precisely tuning the nuclearity of supported metal nanoclusters, particularly on the Zr-based metal-organic framework UiO-66-NH2, offers insights into the interplay between surface structures, adsorption configurations, and catalytic reactivities of Cu-oxo nanoclusters, providing critical information for the engineering of more superior catalytic systems.
Precisely tuning the nuclearity of supported metal nanoclusters is pivotal for designing more superior catalytic systems, but it remains practically challenging. By utilising the chemical and molecular specificity of UiO-66-NH2 (a Zr-based metal-organic framework), we report the controlled synthesis of supported bi- and trinuclear Cu-oxo nanoclusters on the Zr6O4 nodal centres of UiO-66-NH2. We revealed the interplay between the surface structures of the active sites, adsorption configurations, catalytic reactivities and associated reaction energetics of structurally related Cu-based 'single atoms' and bi- and trinuclear species over our model photocatalytic formic acid reforming reaction. This work will offer practical insight that fills the critical knowledge gap in the design and engineering of new-generation atomic and nanocluster catalysts. The precise control of the structure and surface sensitivities is important as it can effectively lead to more reactive and selective catalytic systems. The supported bi- and trinuclear Cu-oxo nanoclusters exhibit notably different catalytic properties compared with the mononuclear 'Cu-1' analogue, which provides critical insight for the engineering of more superior catalytic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据