4.8 Article

Selective covalent targeting of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by enantiopure chlorofluoroacetamide

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 3027-3034

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc06596c

关键词

-

资金

  1. ''Chemistry for Multimolecular Crowding Biosystems (JSPS KAKENHI) [JP17H06349]
  2. AMED [JP18am0101091, JP21ak0101121, JP20.0108519]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [19H02854]
  4. Sumitomo Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H02854] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports an irreversible inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 M-pro with chlorofluoroacetamide (CFA) as a covalent modification agent. The (R,R)-18 isomer showed higher inhibitory activity against M-pro than other isomers. The findings highlight the influence of CFA chirality on the covalent modification of proteinous cysteines and provide a basis for improving the potency and selectivity of CFA-based covalent inhibitors.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated the development of antiviral agents against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The main protease (M-pro) is a promising target for COVID-19 treatment. Here, we report an irreversible SARS-CoV-2 M-pro inhibitor possessing chlorofluoroacetamide (CFA) as a warhead for the covalent modification of M-pro. Ugi multicomponent reaction using chlorofluoroacetic acid enabled the rapid synthesis of dipeptidic CFA derivatives that identified 18 as a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 M-pro. Among the four stereoisomers, (R,R)-18 exhibited a markedly higher inhibitory activity against M-pro than the other isomers. Reaction kinetics and computational docking studies suggest that the R configuration of the CFA warhead is crucial for the rapid covalent inhibition of M-pro. Our findings highlight the prominent influence of the CFA chirality on the covalent modification of proteinous cysteines and provide the basis for improving the potency and selectivity of CFA-based covalent inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据