4.8 Article

A coordination cage hosting ultrafine and highly catalytically active gold nanoparticles

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 461-468

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc05407d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21901222, U1904215, 21671170, 21875207]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0419]
  3. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP)
  4. Program for Young Changjiang Scholars of the Ministry of Education, China [Q2018270]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200044]
  6. Lvyangjinfeng Talent Program of Yangzhou

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size-controlled synthesis of gold nanoparticles using CIAC-108 as a host or stabilizer resulted in smaller nanoparticles with superior catalytic capabilities. The cage-embedded gold nanoparticles showed enhanced catalytic activities and remarkable stability compared to their larger counterparts.
Ultrafine metal nanoparticles (MNPs) with size <2 nm are of great interest due to their superior catalytic capabilities. Herein, we report the size-controlled synthesis of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) by using a thiacalixarene-based coordination cage CIAC-108 as a confined host or stabilizer. The Au NPs encapsulated within the cavity of CIAC-108 (Au@CIAC-108) show smaller size (similar to 1.3 nm) than the ones (similar to 4.7 nm) anchored on the surface of CIAC-108 (Au/CIAC-108). The cage-embedded Au NPs can be used as a homogeneous catalyst in a mixture of methanol and dichloromethane while as a heterogeneous catalyst in methanol. The homogeneous catalyst Au@CIAC-108-homo exhibits significantly enhanced catalytic activities toward nitroarene reduction and organic dye decomposition, as compared with its larger counterpart Au/CIAC-108-homo and its heterogeneous counterpart Au@CIAC-108-hetero. More importantly, the as-prepared Au@CIAC-108-homo possesses remarkable stability and durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据