4.2 Article

Radiation Exposure During Diagnostic and Therapeutic Angiography of Carotid-cavernous Fistula A Retrospective Single Center Observational Study

期刊

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 117-122

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01126-x

关键词

Radiation exposure; Carotid-cavernous fistula; Embolization; Interventional neuroradiology; Cerebral angiography

资金

  1. University Medicine Essen Academy (UMEA) program - German Research Foundation (DFG) [FU356/12-1]
  2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to determine local diagnostic reference levels during endovascular diagnostics and therapy of carotid-cavernous fistulas. Different dose levels were observed between diagnostic angiography and embolization for CCF, with embolization having significantly higher doses.
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) during endovascular diagnostics and therapy of carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCF). Methods In a retrospective study design, DRLs, achievable dose (AD) and mean values were assessed for all patients with CCF undergoing diagnostic angiography (I) or embolization (II). All procedures were performed with the flat-panel angiography system Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Interventional procedures were differentiated according to the type of CCF and the type of procedure. Results In total, 86 neurointerventional procedures of 48 patients with CCF were executed between February 2010 and July 2021. The following DRLs, AD and mean values could be determined: (I) DRL 215 Gy center dot cm(2), AD 169 Gy center dot cm(2), mean 165 Gy center dot cm(2); (II) DRL 350 Gy center dot cm(2), AD 226 Gy center dot cm(2), mean 266 Gy center dot cm(2). Dose levels of embolization were significantly higher compared to diagnostic angiography (p < 0.001). No significant dose difference was observed with respect to the type of fistula or the embolization method. Conclusion This article reports on diagnostic and therapeutic DRLs in the management of CCF that could serve as a benchmark for the national radiation protection authorities. Differentiation by fistula type or embolization method does not seem to be useful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据