4.3 Article

Dynamic responses of elastic marine propellers in non-uniform flows

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14750902211060991

关键词

Fluid-structure interaction; hydroelastic responses; propeller; added mass; added damping; vibration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001130, 11922208, 51839005]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation from Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2019kfyXJJS005]
  3. Major Project for Special Technology Innovation of Hubei Province [2019AAA041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the development of a three-dimensional panel method combined with the finite element method for analyzing the hydroelastic responses of rotating marine propellers in the wake of ships. The fully non-penetration boundary condition imposed on the deformed blade surface is found to be crucial for predicting the unsteady performance of elastic propellers, as it affects the added damping predicted by considering different non-penetration boundary conditions.
This paper focuses on the development of a three-dimensional panel method in time and frequency domains combined with the finite element method for analyzing the hydroelastic responses of rotating marine propellers in the wake of ships. A fully non-penetration boundary condition imposed on the deformed blade surface is conducted, in which the corrections of both the incoming flow velocities and the normal vectors imposed on the deformed and undeformed blade surface are taken into account. The added-mass and -damping matrices due to strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction are considered. Results of the present method are compared with experimental data available in the literature. It is observed that the fully non-penetration boundary condition applied on the deformed blade surface should be imposed to predict the unsteady performance of elastic propellers, which is due to the change of the added damping predicted by considering different non-penetration boundary conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据