4.5 Article

6q deletion is frequent but unrelated to patient prognosis in breast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 216-223

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01301-5

关键词

Breast cancer; 6q15 deletion; TMA; Prognosis; Genomic alterations

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that 6q15 deletion is a common event in breast cancer, statistically associated with unfavorable tumor phenotype and features of genomic instability, but unrelated to patient survival.
Background Deletions involving the long arm of chromosome 6 have been reported to occur in breast cancer, but little is known about the clinical relevance of this alteration. Methods We made use of a pre-existing tissue microarray with 2197 breast cancers and employed a 6q15/centromere 6 dual-labeling probe for fluorescence in situ (FISH) analysis Results Heterozygous 6q15 deletions were found in 202 (18%) of 1099 interpretable cancers, including 19% of 804 cancers of no special type (NST), 3% of 29 lobular cancers, 7% of 41 cribriform cancers, and 28% of 18 cancers with papillary features. Homozygous deletions were not detected. In the largest subset of NST tumors, 6q15 deletions were significantly linked to advanced tumor stage and high grade (p < 0.0001 each). 6q deletions were also associated with estrogen receptor negativity (p = 0.0182), high Ki67 proliferation index (p < 0.0001), amplifications of HER2 (p = 0.0159), CCND1 (p = 0.0069), and cMYC (p = 0.0411), as well as deletions of PTEN (p = 0.0003), 8p21 (p < 0.0001), and 9p21 (p = 0.0179). However, 6q15 deletion was unrelated to patient survival in all cancers, in NST cancers, or in subsets of cancers defined by the presence or absence of lymph-node metastases. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that 6q deletion is a frequent event in breast cancer that is statistically linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and features of genomic instability. The absence of any prognostic impact argues against a clinical applicability of 6q15 deletion testing in breast cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据