4.6 Article

Characterisation of an Anti-Vaccinia Virus F13 Single Chain Fragment Variable from a Human Anti-Vaccinia Virus-Specific Recombinant Immunoglobulin Library

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14020197

关键词

scFv; vaccinia virus; recombinant antibody; F13; epitope mapping

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A human single-chain fragment variable (scFv) library was constructed and an anti-F13 scFv was isolated and characterized. The antigenic binding sites of the scFv were determined. The study suggests that constructing recombinant immunoglobulin libraries is a promising strategy for studying host-pathogen interactions.
Vaccinia virus (VACV) belongs to the genus Orthopoxvirus of the family Poxviridae. There are four different forms of infectious virus particles: intracellular mature virus (IMV), intracellular en-veloped virus (IEV), cell-associated enveloped virus (CEV) and extracellular enveloped virus (EEV). The F13 protein occupies the inner side of the CEV- and EEV-membranes and the outer side of the IEV-membranes. It plays an important role in wrapping progress and EEV production. We constructed a human single-chain fragment variable (scFv) library with a diversity of >= 4 x 108 independent colonies using peripheral blood from four vaccinated donors. One anti-F13 scFv was isolated and characterised after three rounds of panning. In Western blotting assays, the scFv 3E2 reacted with the recombinant F13VACV protein with a reduction of binding under denatured and reduced conditions. Two antigenic binding sites (139-GSIHTIKTLGVYSDY-153 and 169-AFNSAKNSWLNL-188) of scFv 3E2 were mapped using a cellulose membrane encompassing 372 15-mere peptides with 12 overlaps covering the whole F13 protein. No neutralisation capa-bilities were observed either in the presence or absence of complement. In conclusion, the con-struction of recombinant immunoglobulin libraries is a promising strategy to isolate specific scFvs to enable the study of the host-pathogen interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据