4.6 Article

Reduction of Cell Fusion by Deletion in the Hypervariable Region of the Spike Protein of Mouse Hepatitis Virus

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14020398

关键词

mouse hepatitis virus; reduction; cell fusion; hypervariable region; deletion

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea Grant - Korean Government (MOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deletions in the spike gene of mouse hepatitis virus lead to variant viruses with different biological characteristics. The study shows that the deletion in the hypervariable region affects the fusion activity and growth kinetics of the virus.
Deletions in the spike gene of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) produce several variants with diverse biological characteristics, highlighting the significance of the spike gene in viral pathogenesis. In this study, we characterized the JHM-X strain, which has a deletion in the hypervariable region (HVR) of the spike gene, compared with the cl-2 strain, which has a full spike gene. Cytopathic effects (CPEs) induced by the two strains revealed that the size of the CPE produced by cl-2 is much greater than that produced by JHM-X in delayed brain tumor (DBT) cells. Thus, this finding explains the greater fusion activity of cl-2 than JHM-X in cultured cells, and we speculate that the deletion region of the spike protein is involved in the fusion activity differences. In contrast with the fusion activity, a comparison of the virus growth kinetics revealed that the titer of JHM-X was approximately 100 times higher than that of cl-2. We found that the deletion region of the spike protein was involved in fusion activity differences, whereas cl-2 produced significantly higher luciferase activity than JHM-X upon similar expression levels of the spike protein. However, the reason behind the growth difference is still unknown. Overall, we discovered that deletion in the HVR of the spike gene could be involved in the fusion activity differences between the two strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据