4.6 Article

A meta-analysis of the watch-and-wait strategy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer exhibiting complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02415-y

关键词

Watch-and-wait; Complete clinical response; Total mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Cancer Hospital of China Medical University
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province Fund of China [2020-MS-060]
  3. Pilot Cancer Research Fund Project of CSCO (Chinese society of clinical oncology) [Y-2019AZQN-0035]
  4. Dalian University of Technology-Liaoning Cancer Hospital
  5. Institute Cross Joint Fund [LD202130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the local recurrence rate of the W&W group was higher than that of the TME group, other outcomes were similar in the two groups. With the assistance of physical examination and salvage therapy, the W&W strategy could achieve treatment effects similar to the TME approach.
Background Some clinical researchers have reported that patients with cCR (clinical complete response) status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) could adopt the watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy. Compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, the W&W strategy could achieve a similar overall survival. Could the W&W strategy replace TME surgery as the main treatment option for the cCR patients? By using the meta-analysis method, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the W&W strategy and TME surgery for rectal cancer exhibiting cCR after nCRT. Methods We evaluated two treatment strategies for rectal cancer with cCR after nCRT up to July 2021 by searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. Clinical data for primary outcomes (local recurrence, cancer-related death and distant metastasis), and secondary outcomes (disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)) were collected to evaluate the efficacy and safety in the two groups. Results We included nine studies with 818 patients in the meta-analysis, and there were five moderate-quality studies and four high-quality studies. A total of 339 patients were in the W&W group and 479 patients were in the TME group. The local recurrence rate in the W&W group was greater than that in the TME group in the fixed-effects model (OR 8.54, 95% CI 3.52 to 20.71, P < 0.001). The results of other outcomes were similar in the two groups. Conclusion The local recurrence rate of the W&W group was greater than that in the TME group, but other results were similar in the two groups. With the help of physical examination and salvage therapy, the W&W strategy could achieve similar treatment effects with the TME approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据