4.5 Article

Surgical management in pediatric neuroblastoma diagnosis and treatment: a 20-year, single-center experience

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 120-125

出版社

ZHEJIANG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12519-021-00490-5

关键词

International Neuroblastoma Risk Group; International Neuroblastoma Staging System; MYCN; Neuroblastoma; Resection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found no significant change in the role of surgeons in neuroblastoma treatment over the past decade, but there was a decrease in open surgeries for extra-adrenal neuroblastomas and a narrowing of the time interval to surgery.
Background The currently utilized International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system developed in 2009 uses image-defined risk factors as a measure of surgical risk, separating resectable neuroblastoma from those best preceded by chemotherapy. The previous International Neuroblastoma Staging System was based primarily on surgical findings. We hypothesized there would be a change to the role of the surgeon in neuroblastoma treatment in the more recent decade. Methods This is a single center 20-year retrospective analysis of 104 patients with International Classification of Diseases-9 and -10 codes for neuroblastoma. Patient demographics, tumor site, cancer treatment modality, survival, biopsy technique, surgical intervention, and pathology staging were collected. Data was analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test. Results There was a decrease in open surgeries for extra-adrenal neuroblastomas in the later decade (77%, 31%, P = 0.01). There was a narrowing of the time interval to surgery in the later cohort, likely as a result of uniformity in surgical timing on treatment protocols relying on INRG staging. Conclusions Our findings mirror changes in practice patterns globally. We found an increase in minimally invasive approaches but did not find a difference in the role of the surgeon under the INRG staging system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据