4.5 Article

Secure and efficient authentication protocol with user untraceability for global roaming services

期刊

WIRELESS NETWORKS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 5189-5206

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-021-02800-1

关键词

Mutual authentication; Session key exchange; Untraceability; Security; Global roaming service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

User authentication is crucial in global roaming services, but it is not sufficient to ensure secure communication. The proposed protocol uses dynamic keys and pseudonyms to guarantee security and user privacy.
In case of global roaming services, user authentication plays an important role in order to prevent any unauthorized user from accessing services. Preserving anonymity and unlinkability are also crucial to ensure user untraceability over public channel. However, achieving user authenticity and untraceability are not sufficient to guarantee a secure communication. Several active and passive attacks may breach the system security as the mode of communication is considered to be wireless. Hence, requiring a well-designed protocol to resist these vulnerabilities. In this article, we put forward a secure and efficient authentication protocol with user untraceability for global roaming services. The proposed protocol utilizes low-cost cryptographic primitives such as symmetric key encryption/decryption and one-way hash function. We use dynamic keys (rather than long-term keys) to ensure forward/backward secrecy of the session key. The use of dynamic pseudonym ensures user anonymity and unlinkability over public channel. In addition, there is no need to re-synchronize the peers in case of desynchronization attack. The security validation of the proposed protocol is done both formally and informally to ensure robustness of the protocol under various active and passive attacks. Finally, we compare our protocol with some recently proposed approaches in terms of various security and design parameters to ensure its efficiency for low-power applications of global roaming services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据