4.5 Article

Bluetooth 5 performance analysis for inter-vehicular communications

期刊

WIRELESS NETWORKS
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 137-159

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-021-02830-9

关键词

Bluetooth 5; Vehicular networks; Ad hoc networks; Communications performance; Internet of Things

资金

  1. CRUE-CSIC
  2. Springer Nature
  3. Council of Xixon (Asturies-Spain)
  4. University Institute of Industrial Technology of Asturies (IUTA) of the University of Oviedo [SV-18GIJON-1-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the potential of Bluetooth 5 features in VANET applications, proposing a connectionless communication system. Field experiments evaluated Bluetooth 5's long range and speed features, and communication scenarios requirements.
Previous work has demonstrated the feasibility of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) as an alternative technology for data transfers in inter-vehicular communication (IVC) scenarios. Bluetooth 5.x core specifications enhance the trade-off between energy requirements, communication range and flexibility. In this paper, we aim to analyse the potential of Bluetooth 5 features for VANET applications, proposing a connectionless communication system. By means of field experiments, we evaluate long range and 2 x speed features, defining a set of communication scenarios. This allows us to test both Bluetooth 5.x range and application throughput. The evaluation includes experiments of V2I communications carried out under real highway traffic conditions. The experiments conducted demonstrate that communication ranges up to 300 m may be achieved depending on the communications scenario. The results also show how throughput degrades as the distance between devices increases. The results obtained are used to discuss future work, aimed at deeper analysing Bluetooth 5 features for VANET applications, completing the development of our prototype and evaluating VANET connectionless communications with the features included in the latest Bluetooth 5.2 specification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据