Drone thermal imaging technology provides a cost-effective tool for landscape-scale monitoring of a cryptic forest-dwelling species across all population densities

Context. Drones, or remotely piloted aircraft systems, equipped with thermal imaging technology (RPAS thermal imaging) have recently emerged as a powerful monitoring tool for koala populations. Before wide uptake of novel technologies by government, conservation practitioners and researchers, evidence of greater efficiency and cost-effectiveness than with other available methods is required. Aims. We aimed to provide the first comprehensive analysis of the cost-effectiveness of RPAS thermal imaging for koala detection against two field-based methods, systematic spotlighting (Spotlight) and the refined diurnal radial search component of the spot-assessment technique (SAT). Methods. We conducted various economic comparisons, particularly comparative cost-effectiveness of RPAS thermal imaging, Spotlight and SAT for repeat surveys of a low-density koala population. We compared methods on cost-effectiveness as well as long-term costs by using accumulating cost models. We also compared detection costs across population density using a predictive cost model. Key results. Despite substantial hardware, training and licensing costs at the outset (>A$49 900), RPAS thermal imaging surveys were cost-effective, detecting the highest number of koalas per dollar spent. Modelling also suggested that RPAS thermal imaging requires the lowest survey effort to detect koalas within the range of publicly available koala population densities (similar to 0.006 18 koalas ha(-1)) and would provide long-term cost reductions across longitudinal monitoring programs. RPAS thermal imaging would also require the lowest average survey effort costs at a landscape scale (A$3.84 ha(-1)), providing a cost-effective tool across large spatial areas. Conclusions. Our analyses demonstrated drone thermal imaging technology as a cost-effective tool for conservation practitioners monitoring koala populations. Our analyses may also form the basis of decision-making tools to estimate survey effort or total program costs across any koala population density.

Automated summary

The study compared the cost-effectiveness of RPAS thermal imaging, Spotlight, and SAT for monitoring koala populations, finding that RPAS thermal imaging was the most cost-effective option. Models also indicated that RPAS thermal imaging required the lowest survey effort to detect koalas within publicly available population densities and could provide long-term cost reductions for monitoring programs. Additionally, RPAS thermal imaging had the lowest average survey effort costs at a landscape scale, making it a cost-effective tool for monitoring large spatial areas.