4.1 Article

Utilizing cover crops for weed suppression within buffer areas of 2,4-D-resistant soybean

期刊

WEED TECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 118-129

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/wet.2021.84

关键词

Giant ragweed; Ambrosia trifida L; waterhemp; Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq; ) Sauer; cereal rye; Secale cereale L; soybean; Glycine max (L; ) Merr; Termination timing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cover crops can suppress weed growth through direct competition for sunlight, water, and soil nutrients, benefiting soybean cropping systems. Delaying termination of cover crops can lead to increased biomass but may result in yield reductions. Cover crops generally improve weed control in the absence of 2,4-D, but may not reduce densities of all weed species.
Cover crops can be utilized to suppress weeds via direct competition for sunlight, water, and soil nutrients. Research was conducted to determine if cover crops can be used in label-mandated buffer areas in 2,4-D-resistant soybean cropping systems. Delaying termination of cover crops containing cereal rye to at or after soybean planting resulted in a 25 to more than 200 percentage point increase in cover crop biomass compared to a control treatment. Cover crops generally improved horseweed control when 2,4-D was not used. Cover crops reduced grass densities up to 54% at four of six site-years when termination was delayed to after soybean planting. Cover crops did not reduce giant ragweed densities. Cover crops reduced waterhemp densities by up to 45%. Cover crops terminated at or after planting were beneficial within buffer areas for control of grasses and waterhemp, but not giant ragweed. Yield reductions of 14% to 41% occurred when cover crop termination was delayed to after soybean planting at three of six site-years. Terminating the cover crops at planting time provided suppression of grasses and waterhemp within buffer areas and had similar yield to the highest-yielding treatment in five out of six site-years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据