4.5 Article

Use of polypropylene pyrolysis oil in alternative fuel production

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1220-1230

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X211068243

关键词

Polypropylene; slow pyrolysis; low temperature; fuel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polypropylene (PP) was recycled using slow pyrolysis at low temperature. The highest yields of liquid product were obtained at 350 degrees C and 400 degrees C. The pyrolysis oils had properties that met certain standards, but some properties exceeded the reference values stated in the standards, limiting their use in alternative fuel production.
In this study, polypropylene (PP) was recycled in a non-stirred batch reactor by slow pyrolysis at low temperature. Virgin PP and waste PP as well as mixed material of equal amounts of virgin PP plus virgin PP pyrolysis oil (ratio 1:1 w/w) were used as raw material. The highest yields of liquid product were obtained at 350 degrees C and 400 degrees C (82.0 and 82.3 w/w%, respectively). The density, viscosity and calorific value of the gasoline and diesel fractions of the obtained pyrolysis oils comply with EN228 and EN590 standards, respectively. The flash point corresponded to the standard only for some of the oils, but the cold filter clogging point, the pour point and especially the oxidation stability were far above the stated reference values of the standards. The pyrolysis oils as products of thermal decomposition were determined by the methods of H-1 and C-13 and two-dimensional-heteronuclear single quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance (2D-HSQC NMR) spectra. Spectral analysis showed that only very little aromatic compounds were present in the oils, but they contained many unsaturated compounds, which is presumably consistent with the measured oxidation stability and limits their use in the production of alternative fuels. The research octane number (RON) calculated from the NMR analyses corresponds to the lower limit of gasoline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据