4.7 Article

Methane emissions from Icelandic landfills - A comparison between measured and modelled emissions

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 136-145

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.028

关键词

Tracer gas dispersion; Methane oxidation; Landfill gas generation; Gas collection; FOD model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares methane emissions from five Icelandic landfills and finds that the application of the IPCC FOD model for estimating landfill methane emissions in Iceland is appropriate.
This study compares methane (CH4) emissions from five Icelandic landfills, quantified using tracer gas dispersion to modelled emission rates using the IPCC FOD model. The average CH4 emission rates measured from the investigated landfills were 475.4 kg CH4 h(-1) (& PRIME;Alfsnes landfill), 32.5 kg CH4 h(-1) (Fiflholt), 40.8 kg CH4 h(-1) (Gufunes), 9.8 kg CH4 h(-1) (Kirkjuferjuhj & PRIME;aleiga) and 78.4 kg CH4 h(-1) (Stekkjarvik). At three of the landfills (Alfsnes, Fiflholt and Kirkjuferjuhjaleiga), the modelled emission was higher than the measured emission by factors ranging from 1.1 to 4.8, neglecting any CH4 oxidation in the cover soils. Even though CH4 oxidation might play a role at some of the investigated landfills, and thus reduce the gap between modelled and measured emissions, it is likely that the model overestimated CH4 generation due to uncertainties in input model parameters. Assuming that the measured emissions at the five landfills are representative of all the waste disposed in Iceland from 2007 to 2016, the measured emission should be extrapolated to 817 kg CH4 h(-1), which is relatively close to the modelled national emission of 936 kg CH4 h(-1) in 2017. This study showed that the application of the IPCC FOD model at national level is appropriate for estimating landfill CH4 emissions in Iceland. CH(4 & nbsp;)emissions from landfills in Iceland can be reduced by expanding or implementing gas collection or biocover systems for optimised microbial oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据