4.5 Article

Switched model predictive controller for path tracking of autonomous vehicle considering rollover stability

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 4166-4185

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2021.1999990

关键词

Autonomous vehicle; path tracking; switched model predictive controller; rollover stability

资金

  1. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Vehicle Advanced Manufacturing, Measuring and Control Technology (Beijing Jiaotong University), Ministry of Education, China [014062522006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a force-driven switched MPC path tracking control strategy that coordinates active front-wheel steering with an external yaw moment to improve path tracking accuracy and ensure vehicle stability under handling limit conditions. According to simulation results under normal speed and limiting speed conditions, this strategy can improve control accuracy and ensure vehicle stability.
Lateral stability and rollover stability are two most crucial concerns for path tracking of an autonomous vehicle under handling limit conditions. To improve path tracking accuracy and ensure vehicle stability under handling limit conditions, this paper proposes a force-driven switched MPC path tracking control strategy that coordinates active front-wheel steering with an external yaw moment. Firstly, a linear time-varying tire model is modelled using the affine approximate linearisation method to describe rear tire dymamics. And vehicle dynamics is modelled to predict vehicle states in the prediction horizon. Then, a force-driven switched MPC control strategy is proposed based on the system prediction model. The vehicle lateral stability and rollover stability are restricted using maximum tire lateral force and the zero-point moment method, respectively. Finally, according to the simulation results under normal speed and limiting speed conditions, a force-driven switched MPC control strategy can improve control accuracy and ensure vehicle stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据