4.6 Article

Heavy-ion irradiation assisted modification of p-type transparent CuAlO2 films: Electrical, optical and thermoelectric properties

期刊

VACUUM
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110498

关键词

P-type transparent oxide semiconductor; Heavy ion irradiation; Fe ions; Thermoelectric property; CuAlO2 films

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1832149, 61874166]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Qinghai Province [2020-HZ-809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy-ion irradiation is an effective method to enhance the thermoelectric performance of semiconductor films, resulting in increased electrical conductivity and power factor while maintaining a high Seebeck coefficient.
Heavy-ion (HI) irradiation is a unique approach to induce defects in semiconductor films. The ion irradiation leaves continuous columnar tracks to create various defects and reduce film density, modulating the thermoelectric properties of semiconductor films. As a p-type transparent oxide semiconductor (TOS), the as-synthesized CuAlO2 films were irradiated with different doses of Fe10+ ions at room temperature using the 320 kV High Voltage Platform, and then post-annealed to improve the microstructure and thermoelectric properties. The irradiated CuAlO2 films, with 15 x 1013 ions cm-2, can achieve an electrical conductivity of 0.14 S cm-1, which is about 200 times larger than the unirradiated counterparts. The Seebeck coefficient reaches up to 189.80 and 208.58 mu V K-1 at room temperature and 600 K, respectively. Therefore, a high power factor (PF) of 9.15 mu W m- 1K-2 is rendered by the irradiated CuAlO2 films, whereas the unirradiated films are not detected in the given measurement range. The improved thermoelectric performance is mainly due to the increased copper vacancies in irradiated films without significantly reducing the crystallinity. The current work presents a promising strategy to improve the thermoelectric performance of semiconductor films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据