4.5 Article

Couples and COVID-19 vaccination: Frequency and reasons for discordance

期刊

VACCINE
卷 40, 期 13, 页码 1913-1917

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.055

关键词

Beliefs and cognitions; Couples; COVID-19; Psychosocial factors; Social determinants of health; Vaccines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the frequency of concordance and discordance in the COVID-19 vaccination status of intimate couples. Partners are known to influence each other's health behaviors, but previous reports on couples' COVID-19 vaccination status were lacking. Among 1305 respondents living with their partners who participated in an online survey, the COVID-19 vaccination status of couples was found to be 15.63% discordant and 84.37% concordant. Unvaccinated participants with vaccinated partners and vaccinated participants with unvaccinated partners emphasized different potentially modifiable reasons for being unvaccinated. Tailored, scalable interventions involving partners may increase the COVID-19 vaccine concordance rate.
The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of concordance and discordance in the COVID19 vaccination status of intimate couples. Partners are well known to influence each other's health behaviors, but previous reports of couples' COVID-19 vaccination status were not found. Among 1305 respondents to an on-line survey who were living with their partners, couples' COVID-19 vaccination status was 15.63% discordant and 84.37% concordant. Different potentially modifiable reasons for being unvaccinated were emphasized by unvaccinated participants with vaccinated partners and by vaccinated participants with unvaccinated partners. This study provides an estimate of the proportion of couples with discordant COVID-19 vaccine status. The development of tailored, scalable interventions potentially involving the partner might increase the COVID-19 vaccine concordance rate. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据