4.5 Article

Development of recombinant COVID-19 vaccine based on CHO-produced, prefusion spike trimer and alum/CpG adjuvants

期刊

VACCINE
卷 39, 期 48, 页码 7001-7011

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.066

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; Trimeric spike protein; Subunit vaccine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The researchers have developed a recombinant vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, which showed strong immunogenicity in animal studies, inducing robust antibody responses and T cell responses. The vaccine also demonstrated cross-neutralization activity against various variants, significantly reducing viral loads and lung inflammation.
COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the public health and social economy worldwide. A safe, effective, and affordable vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections/diseases is urgently needed. We have been developing a recombinant vaccine based on a prefusion-stabilized spike trimer of SARS-CoV-2 and formulated with aluminium hydroxide and CpG 7909. The spike protein was expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, purified, and prepared as a stable formulation with the dual adjuvant. Immunogenicity studies showed that candidate vaccines elicited robust neutralizing antibody responses and substantial CD4+ T cell responses in both mice and non-human primates. And vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies persisted at high level for at least 6 months. Challenge studies demonstrated that candidate vaccine reduced the viral loads and inflammation in the lungs of SARS-CoV-2 infected golden Syrian hamsters significantly. In addition, the vaccine-induced antibodies showed cross-neutralization activity against B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. These data suggest candidate vaccine is efficacious in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated pneumonia, thereby justifying ongoing phase I/II clinical studies in China (NCT04982068 and NCT04990544). (c) 2021 Shanghai Zerun Biotechnology, Co., Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据