4.5 Article

Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in adult Japanese workers, 2017-2020

期刊

VACCINE
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 621-626

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.016

关键词

Influenza; Influenza vaccines; Adults; Workers; Vaccine effectiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the vaccine effectiveness against influenza in adult workers at a Japanese company. The results showed that the vaccine had a moderate and significant effectiveness in the 2019-20 season, but low or negative effectiveness in the 2017-18 and 2018-19 seasons. Self-reported data from worker records can be useful in determining vaccine effectiveness against influenza.
Background: Previous studies have not estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against influenza in the working-age Japanese population. In this study, we determined VE in adult workers at a Japanese company. Methods: We estimated VE based on self-reported data regarding influenza infections and vaccinations in employees of an auto parts manufacturing company during three influenza seasons from 2017 to 2020. VE was estimated as 100% x [1 odds ratio (the ratio of the odds of being diagnosed with influenza among enrollees with and without influenza vaccination)]. Odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression. Results: We included 11,347 worker records [3,592 (2017-18), 3,663 (2018-19), and 4,092 (2019-20)] from employees who had worked with the company throughout each influenza season. The adjusted VE was moderate and significant in the 2019-20 season (VE = 53%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30% to 69%) but low or negative and non-significant during the 2017-18 (VE = 28%; 95% CI =-5% to 50%) and 2018-19 (VE =-11%; 95% CI = 42% to 14%) seasons. Conclusions: Influenza vaccines were moderately effective during the 2019-20 season but showed low or negative effectiveness during the 2017-18 and 2018-19 seasons. Self-reports from worker records can successfully help determine VE against influenza. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据