4.7 Article

Combined effects of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water on quality of sea bass (Lateolabrax Japonicus) fillets during refrigerated storage

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105854

关键词

Ultrasound; Slightly acidic electrolyzed water; Lateolabrax Japonicus; Refrigerated storage

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFD0901602]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-47-G26]
  3. Ability promotion project of Shanghai Municipal Sci-ence and Technology Commission Engineering Center [19DZ2284000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water proved to be an effective method in prolonging the shelf life of sea bass fillets by inhibiting bacterial growth and maintaining quality. This treatment could retard the increase of bacteria counts, inhibit the formation of odorous substances, and maintain better sensory characteristics.
A novel technique for sea bass (Lateolabrax Japonicus) fillets by combining ultrasound (US) and slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) to inactivate bacteria and maintain quality was developed. Samples were treated with distilled water (DW), US, SAEW and ultrasound combined with slightly acidic electrolyzed water (US + SAEW) for 10 min, respectively. The results suggested that US + SAEW treatment could retard the increase of total viable counts (TVC), Pseudomonas bacteria counts and H2S-producing bacteria counts, which also inhibit the rise of total volatile basis nitrogen (TVB-N), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), pH and K value. In addition, compared with SAEW or US treatment alone, US + SAEW treatment had distinctly effects on inhibiting protein degradation and maintaining better sensory scores. Compared with DW group, the shelf life of sea bass treated with US + SAEW was increased for another 4 days. It indicated that the combined treatment of US and SAEW could be used to the preservation of sea bass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据