4.7 Article

Ultrasonic-assisted preparation of eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion: Process optimization, in vitro digestive stability, and anti-Escherichia coli activity

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105904

关键词

Anti-E. coil activity; Eucalyptus oil; Nanoemulusion; Response surface methodology; Simulated digestion; Ultrasonic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully prepared eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion by adjusting the ultrasonic process parameters, and evaluated its antimicrobial activity under simulated digestion conditions. The results showed that EONE maintained stable particle size and antimicrobial activity during the digestion process.
Eucalyptus oil (EO) is a natural and effective antimicrobial agent; however, it has disadvantages such as poor water solubility and instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of process vessels and preparation process parameters on the particle size of the emulsion droplets using ultrasonic technique and response surface methodology to prepare eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion (EONE). The optimal sonication process parameters in conical centrifuge tubes were confirmed: sonication distance of 0.9 cm, sonication amplitude of 18%, and sonication time of 2 min. Under these conditions, the particle size of EONE was 18.96 +/- 4.66 nm, the polydispersity index was 0.39 +/- 0.09, and the zeta potential was-31.17 +/- 2.15 mV. In addition, the changes in particle size, potential, micromorphology, and anti-Escherichia coli activity of EONE during digestion were investigated by in vitro simulated digestion. The emulsion was stable in simulated salivary fluid, tended to aggregate in simulated gastric fluid, and increased in particle size and potential value in simulated intestinal fluid. EONE showed higher anti -E. coli activity than EO by simulated digestion. These results provide a useful reference for the in vivo antimicrobial application of the essential oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据