4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on heat transfer performance of TiO2 nanofluids in water-ethylene glycol mixture

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.02.009

关键词

Heat transfer; Nanofluids; Titanium dioxide; Water-ethylene glycol mixture

资金

  1. Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) [RDU151411 (RAGS/1/2015/TK0/UMP/03/2)]
  2. Automotive Excellence Center (AEC) [RDU1403153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of nanofluids is essential in heat transfer study due to its effective performance. The performance of nanofluids in mixture based fluids is yet to be explored hence; the study was carried out to provide a wider knowledge and information on heat transfer performance of TiO2 nanofluids. The forced convection heat transfer is conducted at Reynolds number of 3000 to 24,000 under constant heat flux boundary conditions. The TiO2 nanofluid is prepared at 0.5 to 1.5% volume concentration and the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity were measured for 30 to 70 degrees C. The heat transfer performance was evaluated at three different bulk temperatures for its heat transfer coefficient and friction factor; 30, 50 and 70 degrees C. The thermal conductivity and viscosity enhanced with the increase in volume concentration. The heat transfer performance for temperature at 30 degrees C experienced low enhancement compared to the base fluid when the nanofluid concentration was less than 1.2%. However, at temperatures of 50 and 70 degrees C for all volume concentrations, the heat transfer performance improved with a value of h' greater than I. As the working temperature increased, the enhancement became more noticeable for higher concentrations. The friction factor of TiO2 nanofluids is slightly increased with the increase of concentration at approximately 1.1 times of base fluid. The performance factor, h' of the TiO2 nanofluids is significantly influenced by the thermal properties, concentration, temperature, and Reynolds number. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据