4.7 Article

Comparative study of the effect of hybrid nanoparticle on the thermal performance of cylindrical screen mesh heat pipe

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.030

关键词

Screen mesh heat pipe; Hybrid nanofluid; Thermal resistance; Heat load

资金

  1. Research Chair Grant National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  3. National Research University (NRU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal performance of a cylindrical screen mesh heat pipe with hybrid nanofluid was experimentally investigated. The hybrid nanofluid was prepared by mixing Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticles with deionised water. The heat pipe was fabricated with straight copper tube of dimensions 300 mm length, 12.5 mm outer diameter and 1 mm thickness. The wick structure in the heat pipe was created by a three layer copper screen mesh of 100 mesh size. The heat input to the heat pipe was varied from 50 W to 250 Win five equal steps. The heat pipe was tested with three hybrid nanofluids made with combinations of Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticle in DI water (Al2O3 75%-CuO 25%, Al2O3 50%-CuO 50% and Al2O3 25%-CuO 75%). The tested hybrid nanofluids were made with 0.1% volume concentration of Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticle combination in deionised water. The results of the investigation showed that for the maximum heat load of 250 W considered in this work, the thermal resistance of the hybrid nanofluid with combination, Al2O3 25%-CuO 75%, showed 44.25% reduction compared to deionised water. The reduction in thermal resistance is due to the formation of porous coating on the wick surface which increases the wettability and surface roughness thereby creating more nucleation sites as seen in the SEM images. From the experimental investigation, it was observed that hybrid nanofluids are alternative to the conventional working fluids in heat pipes for electronic cooling applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据