4.7 Review

Capturing the microbial volatilome: an oft overlooked 'ome'

期刊

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 622-631

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.12.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [2034192, 2045332]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research Grant [DE-SC0021349]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021349] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [2034192] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [2045332] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial metabolomic studies have focused mainly on nonvolatile metabolites, neglecting the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that play important roles in microbial systems. Advances in VOC detection allow real-time observation and overcome sampling limitations, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of microbial processes when integrating VOC and other 'omics approaches.
Among the diverse metabolites produced by microbial communities, some are volatile. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are vigorously cycled by microbes as metabolic substrates and products and as signaling molecules. Yet, current microbial metabolomic studies predominantly focus on nonvolatile metabolites and overlook VOCs, which therefore represent a missing component of the metabolome. Advances in VOC detection now allow simultaneous observation of the numerous VOCs constituting the 'volatilome' of microbial systems. We present a roadmap for integrating and advancing VOC and other 'omics approaches and highlight the potential for realtime VOC measurements to help overcome limitations in discrete 'omics sampling. Including volatile metabolites in metabolomics, both conceptually and in practice, will build a more comprehensive understanding of microbial processes across ecological communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据