4.6 Review

Maternal inflammation and its ramifications on fetal neurodevelopment

期刊

TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 230-244

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2022.01.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3C9A6091949, 2019R1A6A1A03032869, 2021R1A2C2004501]
  2. Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH115037, R01MH119459]
  4. Jeongho Kim Neurodevelopmental Research Fund
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3C9A6091949, 2019R1A6A1A03032869] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to infections or inflammatory insults during pregnancy can lead to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in children. Rodent models have provided insights into how maternal immune activation (MIA) affects brain development, with key immune factors playing important roles. The microbiome also plays a significant role in shaping maternal immune function and the development of autism-like phenotypes.
Exposure to heightened inflammation in pregnancy caused by infections or other inflammatory insults has been associated with the onset of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in children. Rodent models have provided unique insights into how this maternal immune activation (MIA) disrupts brain development. Here, we discuss the key immune factors involved, highlight recent advances in determining the molecular and cellular pathways of MIA, and review how the maternal immune system affects fetal development. We also examine the roles of microbiomes in shaping maternal immune function and the development of autism-like phenotypes. A comprehensive understanding of the gut bacteriaimmune-neuro interaction in MIA is essential for developing diagnostic and therapeutic measures for high-risk pregnant women and identifying targets for treating inflammation-induced neurodevelopmental disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据