4.7 Article

Poly-γ-glutamic acid: Recent achievements, diverse applications and future perspectives

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.009

关键词

Poly-?-glutamic acid; Microorganisms; Bioproduction; Structural diversity

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Inno-vation Program of Shandong Province [2019JZZY011004]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA28030403]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review presents the advances in gamma-PGA synthesis and metabolic engineering strategies for improving its diversity. The importance of structural diversity in various applications is discussed, along with future research directions.
Background: Poly-gamma-glutamic acid (gamma-PGA) is a chiral biopolymer composed of either L-glutamic acid or D-glutamic acid or both monomers in different ratios and repeating frequency. It is biodegradable, water-soluble, environmentally friendly, and edible, and has versatile industrial applications. Depending on the microbial producers, the molecular weights and stereochemical compositions of gamma-PGA differ substantially, and exhibit great application diversity. It is crucial to control the structural diversity to produce tailor-made gamma-PGA.& nbsp;Scope and approach: This review presents advances in gamma-PGA synthesis in microorganisms and metabolic engineering strategies used to improve gamma-PGA diversity. The fascinating roles of structural diversity in various applications and future research directions in gamma-PGA bio-production are also discussed in this review.& nbsp;Key findings and conclusions: Obtaining the gamma-PGA with specific stereoisomer and molecular weight is an indispensable step in the expanded uses of gamma-PGA. With the development of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology, the production of tailored gamma-PGA in a single host is possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据