4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Biomethane potential evaluation of co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.03.018

关键词

Biomethane potential (BMP); Co-digestion; Organic wastes; Anaerobic digestion; Biogas production

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-digestion of organic rich wastes and wastewater sludge to enhance biogas production has become an attractive economic possibility for water utilities. The suitability of the organic rich waste depends on its ability to produce biogas as well as its influence on the overall anaerobic digestion process. Biomethane potential evaluation was conducted to screen seven organic wastes and dehydrated algae. All co-substrates increased the bio-methane yield by three to six times compared with conventional anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Maximum co-digestion ratios were identifiable for most solid co-substrates including algae (6% wt/wt), undiluted food waste (5% wt/wt), bakery waste (5% wt/wt), and diluted commercial food waste (10% wt/wt). On the other hand, the maximum co-digestions ratio of beverage reject and sewage sludge was 10% (wt/wt). With the exception of fat-oil-grease, all solids free liquid co-substrates evaluated in this study showed a notable synergistic effect, to enhanced removals of total solids, volatile solids (VS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) during anaerobic digestion. The increase in COD removal when co-digesting wastewater sludge and liquid waste was from 2 to 41%. Conversely, the co-digestion of most solid co-substrates resulted in additional VS and COD residuals in the final biosolids. Elevated concentrations of sulphur and phosphorous in all food waste co-substrates suggest that control measures to address H2S in biogas and the accumulation of phosphorus in sludge centrate may be necessary during full scale operation. Data presented here provide the basis for subsequent pilot scale evaluation of anaerobic digestion of these organic rich wastes and wastewater sludge. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据