4.6 Article

Bioaugmentation and biostimulation of hydrocarbon degradation and the microbial community in a petroleum-contaminated soil

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.019

关键词

TPH; Biostimulation; Bioaugmentation; Biodegradation efficiency; Microbial community

资金

  1. Program for Innovative Research Team in Shaanxi (PIRT) [2013KCT-13]
  2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control [MARC 2013D007]
  3. Key Laboratory Project of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [13JS048]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutrient additions can stimulate petroleum hydrocarbon degradation, but little is known about how these additions affect the microbial community involved in that degradation. A microcosm study was conducted to assess the impact of bioaugmentation with Acinetobacter SZ-1 strain KF453955 and bio-stimulation with nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus on petroleum hydrocarbon degradation efficiency and microbial community dynamics during bioremediation of an oil-contaminated soil. Soils were incubated without shaking at room temperature for 10 weeks, and petroleum hydrocarbon degradation efficiency, catalase activity, petroleum hydrocarbon degrader population, and bacterial community diversity were determined. Results showed biostimulation and bioaugmentation, respectively, promoted 60% and 34% degradation of the total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) after six weeks of incubation. A degradation plateau occurred in the seventh week. Catalase activity and the populations of oil degraders in soil were generally greater for biostimulation than for bioaugmentation. The inoculants survived into the seventh week for the bioaugmentation treatment, and bacterial diversity did not increase by biostimulation. The populations of TPH-degraders in soil were positively related to TPH degradation efficiency during bioremediation of petroleum-polluted soils. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据