4.2 Article

Circulating exosomes induced by respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipients activate cellular stress, innate immune pathways and epithelial to mesenchymal transition

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101480

关键词

Respiratory viral infection; Exosomes; Cell signaling; Lung transplant

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI123034, HL056643, HL092514]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that exosomes from lung transplant recipients with respiratory viral infection contain nucleic acids capable of inducing innate immune signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Therefore, the authors propose that respiratory viral infection may lead to the generation of exosomes that initiate the process of CLAD in mouse models. The novel findings identify the molecular mechanisms through which respiratory viral infection increases the risk of CLAD.
Background: Chronic lung transplant rejection occurs in over 50% of lung transplant recipients and mechanism of chronic rejection is unknown. Evaluation of potential mechanism of exosomes from lung transplant recipients diagnosed with respiratory viral infection (RVI) in inducing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Method: Exosomes were isolated from lung transplant recipients followed by DNA and RNA isolation from exosomes. Cell signaling mechanisms were studied by co-culturing exosomes with human epithelial cells. Mice were immunized with exosomes and lung homogenates were studied for immune signaling proteins. Results: Exosomes from lung transplant recipients with RVI carry nucleic acids which are capable of inducing innate immune signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Conclusion: Therefore, we propose that RVI can lead to induction of exosomes that initiate the process leading to CLAD in mice models. These novel findings identified the molecular mechanisms by which RVI increases the risk of CLAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据