4.7 Article

Macrophage polarization and diabetic wound healing

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 109-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that the polarization state of macrophages plays a crucial role in diabetic wound healing, with normal wounds transitioning to pro-healing M2 macrophages while diabetic wounds continue to exhibit pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage polarization. Targeting factors that promote M2 macrophage polarization and treatments aimed at reducing hyperglycemia and pro-inflammatory cytokines may be key in improving diabetic wound healing outcomes.
Diabetes mellitus is a costly disease and nearly one-third of these costs are attributed to management of diabetic foot disease including chronic, non-healing, diabetic foot ulcers. Therefore, much effort has been placed into understanding the pathogenesis of diabetic wounds and novel therapeutics. A relatively new area of interest has been macrophage polarization and its role in diabetic wound healing. Diabetic wounds show dysregulated and persistent M1 (pro-inflammatory) macrophage polarization whereas normal wounds will display a transition to M2 (pro-healing) macrophages around day three after wounding. We reviewed factors known to affect macrophage polarization, mostly focused on those that contribute to M2 macrophage polarization, and potential treatments that at least in part target macrophage polarization in the diabetic wound bed. Much of the work has been aimed at reducing hyperglycemia and encouraging pro-inflammatory cytokine neutralization or decreased expression given this has a significant role in producing M1 macrophages. Treatment of diabetic wounds will likely require a multi-modal approach including management of underlying diabetes and control of hyperglycemia, topical therapeutics, and prevention of secondary infection and inflammation. (Translational Research 2021; 236:109-116)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据