4.0 Article

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients: Diagnosis, incidence, prophylaxis, and treatment

期刊

TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2022.103372

关键词

Veno-occlusive disease; Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; Liver stiffness measurement; Defibrotide; Methylprednisolone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, and imaging techniques are not yet routinely used. The only approved drug for treatment is defibrotide.
Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) affecting the liver is a rare, possibly life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Sinusoidal endothelial cell (SEC) damage triggered by various factors (especially conditioning regimen) results in post sinusoidal portal hypertension due to obstruction of the hepatic vein. Diagnosis is guided by traditional clinical diagnostic criteria; the modified Seattle criteria, the Baltimore and revised European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), specifically. While there are promising results of imaging techniques studies in the diagnosis of VOD/ SOS, none of those imaging techniques are routinely utilized in diagnosis yet. However, risk stratification is essential; conflicting results have been shown in studies aiming to define risk factors for development of VOD/ SOS conducted to date. The only approved drug for the treatment of VOD/SOS yet is defibrotide, with early treatment offering higher chances of survival. In this review, we will focus on pathogenesis, clinical presentation and diagnostic criteria, risk factors, prophylaxis, and treatment of the VOD/SOS occurring post-HSCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据