4.1 Article

Air, Air, Air: a champion midwife programme in Tanzania using HOT neonatal resuscitation-lessons learned

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trab154

关键词

collective self-efficacy; midwife; neonatal resuscitation; training; transferring clinical skills

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study showed that providing guided instruction during real-life resuscitation changed midwives' beliefs about neonatal resuscitation. Visible success during an actual emergency can increase confidence and collective self-efficacy.
Background Tanzania has approximately 40 000 newborn deaths per year, with >25% of these linked to intrapartum-related hypoxia. The Helping Babies Breathe(C) and Golden minute(C) (HBB(C)) programme was developed to teach skilled intervention for non-breathing neonates at birth. While Helping Babies Breathe(C) and Golden minute(C), providing training in simulated bag and mask ventilation, is theoretically successful in the classroom, it often fails to transfer to clinical practice without further support. Furthermore, the proclivity of midwives to suction excessively as a first-line intervention is an ingrained behaviour that delays ventilation, contributing to very early neonatal deaths. Methods The 'champion' programme provided guided instruction during a real-life resuscitation. The site was Amana Hospital, Tanzania. The labour ward conducts 13 500 deliveries annually, most of which are managed by midwives. Brief mannikin simulation practice was held two to three times a week followed by bedside hands-on training (HOT) of bag and mask skills and problem solving while reinforcing the mantra of 'air, air, air' as the first-line intervention during a real-life emergency. Results Champion midwives (trainers) guided instructions given during a real emergency at the bedside caused learners beliefs to change. Trainees observed changes in baby skin colour and the onset of spontaneous breathing after effective ventilation. Conclusions Visible success during an actual real-life emergency created confidence, mastery and collective self-efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据