4.7 Article

Effects of La substitution on microstructure and hydrogen storage properties of Ti-Fe-Mn-based alloy prepared through melt spinning

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65717-5

关键词

La substitution; Ti-Fe-Mn-based alloy; melt spinning; hydrogen storage kinetics; thermodynamics

资金

  1. Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation, China [2019BS05005]
  2. Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology Innovation Fund, China [2019QDL-B11]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51901105, 51871125, 51761032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of La substitution for Ti on the microstructure, hydrogen storage kinetics and thermodynamics of TiFe-type Ti-Fe-Mn-based alloy were investigated. La substitution promotes the formation of micro-defects in the alloys, facilitating hydrogen diffusion and improving hydrogen storage kinetics properties.
The as-spun Ti1-xLaxFe0.8Mn0.2 (x=0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, molar fraction) alloys were prepared by melt spinning. The effects of La substitution for Ti on the microstructure, hydrogen storage kinetics and thermodynamics of TiFe-type Ti-Fe-Mn-based alloy were investigated. The as-spun alloys hold the TiFe single phase, which transforms to TiFeH0.06, TiFeH, and TiFeH2 hydrides after hydrogenation. La substitution promotes the formation of micro-defects (such as dislocations and grain boundaries) in the alloys, thus facilitating hydrogen diffusion. In addition, the hydrogen storage kinetics properties are improved after introducing La element. With the rise of La content, the hydrogen storage capacity decreases firstly and then increases, but the absolute value of hydriding enthalpy change (vertical bar Delta H vertical bar) increases firstly and then reduces. When x=0.01, the maximum value of vertical bar Delta H vertical bar is obtained to be (25.23 +/- 0.50) kJ/mol for hydriding, and the alloy has the maximum hydrogen absorption capacity of (1.80 +/- 0.04) wt.% under the conditions of 323 K and 3 MPa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据