4.7 Review

Capillary electrophoresis and the biopharmaceutical industry: Therapeutic protein analysis and characterization

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116407

关键词

Capillary electrophoresis; Size heterogeneity; Charge variants; Glycosylation; Monoclonal antibodies; Therapeutic modalities; Biopharmaceuticals

资金

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary [TKP2020-IKA-07, 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capillary electrophoresis is a powerful technique for comprehensive physicochemical characterization of therapeutic biomolecules, such as monoclonal antibodies, providing high resolution separation and high sensitivity characterization. Techniques like SDS-CGE, CZE, and iCIEF are increasingly used to assess heterogeneity in mAbs and related therapeutic modalities, with advantages and disadvantages that are critically discussed.
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has emerged as a powerful technique for comprehensive physicochemical characterization of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as well as other therapeutic modalities. The method provides high resolution separation and high sensitivity characterization for analysis of therapeutic biomolecules. CE based techniques such as sodium dodecyl sulphate capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE, also referred to as CE SDS), capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (iCIEF) have been increasingly adopted to assess size heterogeneity, glycosylation heterogeneity and charge heterogeneity in mAbs and related therapeutic modalities. This paper reviews the latest application developments of CE based methods for routine release testing, stability testing and in-depth characterization. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of each of these techniques are critically discussed. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据