4.2 Article

Electrospinning Fabrication Methods to Incorporate Laminin in Polycaprolactone for Kidney Tissue Engineering

期刊

出版社

KOREAN TISSUE ENGINEERING REGENERATIVE MEDICINE SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s13770-021-00398-1

关键词

Laminin; Kidney; Emulsion; Scaffold; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education Studentship for Higher and Overseas Education
  2. MRC [MR/L012766/1]
  3. MRC [MR/L012766/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current treatment options for renal diseases are insufficient, prompting the exploration of tissue engineering as a new approach. This study investigates the incorporation of laminin into polycaprolactone electrospun scaffolds, demonstrating the importance of hybrid scaffolds for kidney tissue engineering.
BACKGROUND: Today's treatment options for renal diseases fall behind the need, as the number of patients has increased considerably over the last few decades. Tissue engineering (TE) is one avenue which may provide a new approach for renal disease treatment. This involves creating a niche where seeded cells can function in an intended way. One approach to TE is combining natural extracellular matrix proteins with synthetic polymers, which has been shown to have many positives, yet a little is understood in kidney. Herein, we investigate the incorporation of laminin into polycaprolactone electrospun scaffolds. METHOD: The scaffolds were enriched with laminin via either direct blending with polymer solution or in a form of emulsion with a surfactant. Renal epithelial cells (RC-124) were cultured on scaffolds up to 21 days. RESULTS: Mechanical characterization demonstrated that the addition of the protein changed Young's modulus of polymeric fibres. Cell viability and DNA quantification tests revealed the capability of the scaffolds to maintain cell survival up to 3 weeks in culture. Gene expression analysis indicated healthy cells via three key markers. CONCLUSION: Our results show the importance of hybrid scaffolds for kidney tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据