4.5 Article

What controls the width of ductile shear zones?

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 816, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229033

关键词

Rheology; Strain localization; Shear zone width; Shear zone geometry

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1650173]
  2. University of Southern California Research Enhancement Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reconstructed the geometry and rheology of the Simplon Shear Zone, finding that the width increases with depth and during exhumation, weak mica layers formed, increasing strain localization.
It is widely recognized that major brittle faults in the upper crust transition downwards into ductile shear zones that then widen with depth. However, the controls on shear zone width at any specific depth, and the mechanisms that may cause the width to change over time, are less well understood. This study therefore reconstructs the geometry and rheology of the crustal-scale, normal-sense Simplon Shear Zone between the depths of similar to 3 and similar to 26 km, by combining field- and microstructural mapping, quartz paleopiezometry, and published estimates for the pressure, temperature, and timing of deformation at different crustal levels. The geometry is complex, with multiple strands actively deforming at any one depth, although overall the cumulative width does increase downwards. A scaling law is developed relating shear zone width to rheology and displacement rate, assuming simple shear and neglecting stretching parallel to the shear plane, and rheological parameters for granitoids with a quartz, feldspar, or mica dominated microstructure are quantified. Localization during exhumation was primarily accompanied by hydrous retrogression of feldspar to white mica, and the associated formation of interconnected weak mica layers. This weakened the shear zone, allowing the degree of strain localization to increase (and the shear zone width to decrease) by a factor of similar to 4-9.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据