4.0 Article

Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Novelties in Microlicia (Melastomataceae) with an Updated Checklist to the Genus in the Serra do Cipo, Minas Gerais, Brazil

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 812-827

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364421X16312067913516

关键词

Campo rupestre; endemism; Espinhaco Range; Microlicieae; new name; synonyms

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [APQ-01911-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes three new species of Microlicia endemic to Serra do Cipo, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, with distinct characteristics. It also elevates Microlicia linifolia var. naudiniana to species rank and synonymizes M. nortecipoana and M. petiolulata under M. hirtoferruginea. Additionally, an updated checklist of Microlicia species in the Serra do Cipo is provided.
Three new species of Microlicia endemic to Serra do Cipo, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, are described here. Microlicia joaosemiriana and M. longiglandulosa are characterized by their sessile leaves, congested flowers at the apex of the branches, dimorphic stamens with tetrasporangiate and bicolorous anthers. However, M. joaosemiriana differs in having hypanthium and sepal covered only with spherical glands and sepal shorter than the hypanthium length. Microlicia longiglandulosa has hypanthium and sepal with glandular trichomes mixed with spherical glands and sepal longer than the hypanthium length. Microlicia jolyana has a petiolate and thickened leaf, lanceolate to oblong leaf blade, rounded to slightly acuminate at the apex, smooth and not striate hypanthium surface, triangular-oblong and thickened sepal, dimorphic stamens, and purple to purple-blackish anther on both whorls. Also, Microlicia linifolia var. naudiniana is elevated to species rank with a new name (Microlicia acerosa), and M. nortecipoana and M. petiolulata are synonymized under M. hirtoferruginea. Additionally, we provide an updated checklist of Microlicia species in the Serra do Cipo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据