4.0 Article

Taxonomic Study of the Species of Maranta Plum ex. L. (Marantaceae) from Northeastern Brazil: A Neglected Diversity Center for the Genus with Five New Species

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 582-610

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364421X16312067913345

关键词

Atlantic Forest; Caatinga; Cerrado; Neotropics; Zingiberales

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]
  2. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a taxonomical summary of Maranta species in northeastern Brazil, identifying new records and describing five new species. The region is highlighted as a center of diversity for Maranta, with some species being considered endangered. Informal conservation statuses, descriptions, distribution maps, and an identification key are provided for reference.
This study summarizes the taxonomy of the species of Maranta from northeastern Brazil. While 20 names have been proposed in the region, only 13 are accepted. We provide two new records, M. rugosa and M. polystachya, and five new species are described, of which M. bahiensis and M. villosovaginata are endemic to Bahia, M. chrysogina to Ceara, M. vieirae to Maranhao, and M. lorifolia occurs in Bahia and Espirito Santo. Maranta noctiflora, M. parvifolia, M. phrynioides, and M. rupicola L. have distributions outside of the study area, while M. anderssoniana and M. hatschbachiana are synonymized. Our final checklist includes 21 species, which represent more than half of the species in the genus, highlighting northeastern Brazil as a center of diversity for Maranta. Among the species listed, M. lorifolia, M. tuberculata, and M. zingiberina are thought to be endangered (EN), while M. gigantea is likely critically endangered (CR). Finally, this study provides informal conservation statuses, descriptions, distribution maps, and an identification key to the species. Typifications for M. subterranea and M. polystachya are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据